@article{oai:dmu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002012,
 author = {石綿, 啓子 and 鈴木, 明美 and 遠藤, 恭子 and Keiko, Ishiwata and Akemi, Suzuki and Kyoko, Endo},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {獨協医科大学看護学部紀要, Bulletin of Dokkyo Medical University School of Nursing},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {＜目的＞看護師の共感経験と情動知能との関係を明らかにする．
＜方法＞ A 県内の6 病院に勤務する看護師930人を対象に自記式質問紙調査を行った．共感経験は，角田による共感経験尺度，情動知能は，豊田らによる情動スキルとコンピテンス尺度を用いた．分析は統計解析ソフトIBM SPSS Ver.19 for Win. を用いて記述統計量，共感経験4 群間の差の検定には一元配置分散分析，その後の検定にはTukey法を行った．
＜結果＞回答697人（回収率74.9%）有効回答692人（有効回収率99.3%）で，このうち今回は女性638人（92.2%）を分析した．A 両向型183人（28.7%），B 共有型140人（21.9%），C 不全型213人（33.4%），D両貧型102人（16.0%）であった．平均年齢は, 全体で36.8±10.2歳で，4群別でみるとA 35.8±9.8（SD）歳，B 35.6 ± 9.8 歳，C 37.7 ±10.3 歳，D 38.5 ± 10.8 歳でDが最も高かった．看護師経験年数は，全体で13.6 ± 9.6年，A 12.5 ± 9.2 年，B 13.4 ±9.5 年，C 14.2 ± 9.7 年，D 14.8 ± 10.0 年でDが最も長かった．勤務形態は，全体では2交代制342人（53.6%）が最も多く，そのうち4群別はC 114 人（53.5%）が最も多かった．情動スキルとコンピテンス尺度の下位尺度別に平均値と標準偏差でみると，「認識と理解」では，全体33.4 ± 7.4点で，4群別は最も高かったのはB 36.8 ± 6.9 点で，A,C,D に比べ有意（P ＜ 0.05）に得点が高かった．「表現と命名」では，全体24.0 ± 5.1 点で，4群別では最も高かったのはB 25.2 ± 5.4点でC,D に比べ有意（P ＜ 0.05）に得点が高かった．「制御と調節」では全体24.9 ± 4.4 点で，4群別は最も高かったのはB 26.2 ± 4.3 点で，C,D に比べ有意（P ＜ 0.05）に得点が高かった．共感経験の4群別は，B共有型は情動知能の3下位尺度「認識と理解」「表現と命名」「制御と調節」が，A,C,D に比べ有意に高く，同情的に相手を理解している看護師が情動知能を用いていることが明らかとなった．
＜結論＞看護師の情動知能は共感経験類型により異なることをふまえた，共感性の高い看護実践を支援する方法の検討が必要であることが示唆された．, Objective: This study aimed to clarify the relationship between nurses ’ experience of empathy and emotional intelligence.
Methods: A cohort of 930 nurses was given self-administered questionnaires, and a total of 692 valid responses were used for analysis. The survey included the Kakuta experience of empathy scale and the Toyoda emotional skill and competence scale, as well as the backgrounds of subjects.　In the statistical analysis, descriptive statistics were calculated using IBM SPSS ver.19 for Microsoft Windows （TM）. In the test of diff erences between four experience of empathy groups, one-way analysis of variance was performed followed by Tukey’s test.
Result: The four groups were A 183 persons（ 28.7%）, B 140 persons（ 21.9%）, C with 213 persons（33.4%）, and D with 102 persons （16.0%）. The mean age of all subjects was 36.8 ± 10.2 （SD）years. Of the 4 groups, mean age was 35.8±9.8（ SD） years in A, 35.6±9.8 years in B, 37.7±10.3 years in C, and 38.5 ± 10.8 years in D, the highest. Years of nursing experience were 13.6 ± 9.6 years for all subjects, 12.5 ± 9.2 years for B, 14.2 ± 9.7 years for C, and 14.8 ± 10.0 years for D, the longest. Of the four experience of empathy groups, B had significantly higher scores than groups A, C, and D on three subscales of emotional intelligence:“ recognition and understanding,”“ expression and naming,” and “control and regulation.”This shows that nurses who understand other people compassionately use emotional intelligence.
Conclusions: Based on the finding that a nurse's emotional intelligence changes with empathy experience type, it is suggested that examination of how to support nursing practices with a high level of empathy is needed.},
 pages = {1--14},
 title = {看護師の共感経験と情動知能との関係},
 volume = {6},
 year = {2013}
}